Re: China


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Skeptics Society Message Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Amanda on January 07, 1997 at 08:25:09:

In Reply to: Re: China posted by David Naughton on January 06, 1997 at 21:06:13:


: :
: : : Is there any truth to this idea that China has something up its
: : : sleeve? That it now has an impressive collection of high-tech
: : : weaponry that could compete with the US and that it has plans to
: : : increase it's power in the world by some secret technology or
: : : advancement. I've heard it has serious disputes with the US. I
: : : also know that in Canada, Jean Cretian is working hard to further
: : : the ties with China and I'm wondering what the big deal is about?
: : : Are there reasons why it has become so important and is being
: : : discussed more in the media? I know little about China save that
: : : it is a communist country with the largest population and will be
: : : taking back Hong Kong in July. Is there any validation why some
: : : seem to fear the possible future actions of this country?

: : Great article on China in the NY Times - Sunday - Week in Review
: : section - cleared a few matters up for me. It appears that China has
: : been spending a bit of money in the US similar to what Japan did in
: : the 80s but not with as much success. It doesn't seem like there is
: : anything to be worried about here.

: On the contrary, there are some reasons to be concerned about China.
: I haven't heard anything about the high-tech weaponry you speak of,
: but I have heard that the US is turning a blind eye to China's nuclear
: weapons proliferation, among other things. The reasons for this, as
: is so often the case with foreign policy, are economic. Normally US
: foreign policy places restrictions on trade with any nation testing or
: manufacturing nuclear weapons. However, China has been awarded a
: "Most-favored Nation" trade status by the US despite that fact that it
: has been doing just that. China also has an abysmal record on human
: rights. As is well known, it makes political prisoners of anyone who
: makes any serious criticism of its government, and these political
: prisoners are often beaten and tortured.

: The reason that China has not been subjected to the usual restricions
: is that the huge profits of many US companies rely on the exploitation
: of China's huge pool of cheap labor. I suspect that this is also the
: reason why Jean Cretian wants to strengthen ties with China. According
: to a recent edition of "Dateline NBC", about 80-90% of the toys sold
: in the US are made in China, as well as many other products. These US
: companies, not wanting to lose their profits, put enormous pressure on
: the US government to allow unrestricted trade with China, despite its
: human rights abuses. Some of these abuses are directly supported by
: US business, as many of the Chinese laborers who maunfacture their
: products are subjected to sweatshop conditions. These
: laborers often work 12+ hour shifts and are beaten if they
: fall asleep on the job. In addition, factory doors are usually locked
: so no one can sneak out. This has resulted in the deaths of hundreds
: of Chinese workers in the last couple of years when fires have
: destroyed some of the factories. The workers, being locked in,
: couldn't get out.

: The US government has cited some recent Chinese reforms as the reason
: why China has been given the "Most-favored Nation" status, but these
: reforms have been purely economic, moving many of its coastal
: manufacturing towns toward a capitalist economy. To my knowledge,
: little or no pressure has been put on China by the Clinton
: administration regarding human rights or nuclear weapons. In fact,
: one of the biggest areas of concern about China voiced by the US
: government and media has been over intellectual property rights, such
: as the pirating of US compact discs by small-time Chinese criminals.
:

Massive amount of info there - thank ya.
The article I refered to did allude to the idea that US wasn't raising much of a fuss b/c of the profit it recieves - it was quite clear to me that this was the case and I'm surprised (probably a little naive too) that this is allowed to go on. I also read that China is changing their laws a bit - no longer allowing prisoners to be held without reason for more than 30 days - this of course has had the adverse effect of hammering down on the many that are in prison right now for no justifiable reason. I know there's been a bit of work done regarding the human rights problem in China but I haven't heard much about it. Is it that important that the US/Canada continue to ignore such matters for the sake of business? Doesn't China rely on the US for similar reasons?
I was thinking more along the lines that US had other reasons for not wanting to piss China off. There are rumours that if the US doesn't treat China with a gentle hand, China might have something to harm us - it looks like it's all a matter of economics here and I can't see how that justifies the rest of the picture.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Skeptics Society Message Board ] [ FAQ ]